California's Environmental Rollback: The Dismantling of CEQA Protections

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two bills on Monday that environmental advocates are calling the most devastating attack on environmental protections in the state's recent history. Assembly Bill 130 and Senate Bill 131 systematically dismantle core provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), eliminating environmental safeguards that have protected California's landscapes, wildlife, and vulnerable communities for over half a century.

The End of Environmental Transparency

CEQA, signed into law by then-Governor Ronald Reagan in 1970, was designed to ensure government transparency and public participation in land-use decisions. The law required agencies to identify and mitigate environmental impacts, protecting ecosystems, preserving scenic vistas and waterways, and safeguarding community health throughout the state.

These new bills effectively gut these protections, allowing developers to bypass environmental review for vast categories of projects. The legislation represents what more than 100 environmental organizations have condemned as "an unprecedented rollback to California's fundamental environmental and community protections." 

Coastal Zone Impacts

The legislation's impact on California's Coastal Zone presents particularly troubling implications for habitat protection. While SB 131 does not affect the Coastal Act itself, its CEQA exemptions apply throughout the Coastal Zone, leaving projects with no environmental review unless they fall within the bill's limited exclusions. 

The legislation's carveout for "environmentally sensitive habitat areas" (ESHA) provides inadequate protection, as many important habitats—including coastal sage scrub and chaparral—may not meet ESHA designation criteria despite their critical role in wildlife movement and ecosystem function. This means SB 131 projects can proceed in the Coastal Zone without environmental review or mitigation, destroying important habitat lands that previously would have received protection. 

Furthermore, as CEQA has historically prepared project proponents for successful Coastal Development Permits, its elimination may lead developers to view the Coastal Act as their primary obstacle, potentially setting the stage for future attacks on coastal protections.

Eliminating Protections for Vulnerable Communities

Perhaps most concerning is the legislation's impact on environmental justice. The bills remove critical safeguards that have historically protected low-income communities and communities of color from disproportionate environmental burdens. Advanced manufacturing facilities—including semiconductor plants, nuclear facilities, and industrial factories handling hazardous materials—can now be permitted in vulnerable communities without any environmental review.

The risks are not theoretical. Silicon Valley's Santa Clara County already hosts 23 active Superfund sites—more than any other county in the nation—largely from semiconductor facilities that have contaminated groundwater with chemical solvents. With these facilities now exempt from both federal NEPA requirements and state CEQA review, they will receive virtually no environmental oversight.

Abandoning Wildlife and Habitat Protection

The environmental consequences extend far beyond human communities. The legislation contains no protections for sensitive and endangered species, potentially exposing hundreds of thousands of acres of forests, chaparral, deserts, and coastal areas to unregulated development. 

Undermining Democratic Processes

The legislation also weakens public participation in environmental decision-making. New provisions allow agencies to exclude staff notes and internal communications from public records requests, enabling government employees to pick and choose what information becomes public while obscuring concerns or risks about projects. This directly undermines CEQA's original purpose of ensuring transparency in government decision-making.

The rushed legislative process itself exemplifies this erosion of democratic norms. SB 131 was introduced on Friday and passed on Monday, with virtually no time for public input or amendments. Environmental groups were excluded from meaningful participation in developing legislation that will fundamentally reshape California's environmental landscape.

The Political Poison Pill Strategy

Governor Newsom's decision to tie these bills to the state's $320 billion budget deal represents an unprecedented abuse of the legislative process. This "poison pill" strategy would have invalidated the entire spending plan if the environmental rollbacks were rejected, forcing lawmakers to choose between funding essential services and protecting environmental safeguards.

This approach bypassed normal legislative deliberation and public engagement, allowing sweeping environmental deregulation to proceed without the scrutiny such consequential changes deserve. 

​​The Housing Crisis Rationale

All of this came about because developers and some politicians have long argued that CEQA reform is essential to address California's severe housing shortage, which has contributed to soaring costs and persistent homelessness affecting nearly 40 million residents. Development experts predict the changes will speed up the building process by allowing urban core projects to skip environmental review, which can take several months. However, some question whether this will significantly increase total housing production given ongoing challenges with construction costs, insurance, and interest rates.

A National Precedent for Environmental Retreat

California's actions may signal a broader retreat from environmental protection among Democratic-led states. With similar environmental laws in Massachusetts, New York, Minnesota, and other states, California's rollback could embolden other governors to weaken their own environmental protections in the name of development.

This represents a fundamental shift for a state that has long been at the forefront of environmental protection, potentially undermining decades of progress in preserving natural resources and protecting vulnerable communities from environmental harm.

The Fight Continues

Environmental groups have vowed to continue their opposition, calling for "clean-up legislation" to restore some protections. However, the damage to California's environmental framework is profound and may prove difficult to reverse. The legislation has already eliminated crucial safeguards that took decades to establish, potentially setting the stage for irreversible environmental and public health consequences.

By gutting CEQA, the legislature has effectively cleared the path for future attacks on the Coastal Act, which has already faced repeated legislative assaults in recent years. With CEQA's protective framework dismantled, the Coastal Act now stands as the primary remaining barrier to unchecked development along California's coastline. 

Environmental advocates – including Surfrider and our ActCoastal allies – fear that developers, having successfully eliminated one major environmental law, will inevitably target the Coastal Act next in their campaign to remove all regulatory obstacles to profitable development. 

What can you do?

Sign up for ActCoastal’s newsletter to stay up on what’s happening in the Coastal Zone and know when your action is needed.

Sign our petition to Governor Newsom demanding he protect the California Coastal Act and the rights enshrined within it.

Join Surfrider to support our mission of protection and enjoyment of the world’s ocean, waves, and beaches for all people through a powerful activist network!